Recent Blog Posts
-
When Call-Center Scripts Go Bad
May 25 20128:38 am EDT -
Zynga on the Defense
May 24 20123:02 pm EDT -
Facebook Fallout Includes PR Fail
May 24 20129:25 am EDT -
Space Drama to Be Continued
May 21 20129:42 am EDT -
What Made Groupon Go Pop?
May 18 20129:34 am EDT -
Study Finds Millennials are Underbanked
May 17 201212:35 pm EDT -
Mad Men Not Impressed With Facebook IPO
May 17 201210:13 am EDT -
Pricing Experiment in Progress
May 16 201211:02 am EDT -
Did I Tweet That Out Loud?
May 15 20129:44 am EDT -
Revenge of the Liberal Arts Major
May 14 20122:58 pm EDT
LivingSocial Losses Shouldn’t Shock
LivingSocial lost money and lots of it: $558 million on $245 million in revenue in 2011.
This news was revealed Wednesday within the security filings of Amazon.com, which owns a stake in the daily deal company and—as the Washington Business Journal points out today—was compelled to record it because of the level of equity interest it has in the company, which is 31 percent.
The level of losses surprised some, because LivingSocial has tried to distance itself, image-wise, from Groupon, which became the focus of criticism after its losses were laid bare in the paperwork filed to go public. What's more, the losses are a lot bigger and the revenues a lot less than those of Groupon, which on its results for the nine months ended September 30 recorded a net loss of $238 million on revenues of $1.1 billion.
But careful followers of the daily deal market shouldn’t exactly be gasping. After all, LivingSocial may have a different management style than Groupon, with Tim O’Shaughnessy playing the straitlaced CEO to Groupon’s Andrew Mason having a more offbeat leadership style, but at the end of the day, the two companies are following a very similar business model, rapid-fire growth included.
That fast growth—the same growth we’ve seen with Zynga, LinkedIn, and Facebook (which certainly isn’t hurting for profits now)—is one reason for the losses.
As for more specific ones, a source with knowledge of LivingSocial’s financials told the Washington Business Journal that much of that operating loss was incurred earlier in 2011, and that the losses narrowed later in the year as the company scaled back marketing expenses, a budgetary move that Groupon also made. The revenue also doesn’t take into account LivingSocials' overseas operations, the source said, adding that part of the loss can be attributed to a series of acquisitions paid for through a mix of cash and stock.
So while LivingSocial’s losses should not totally surprise, the filing is a reminder that an e-commerce giant has LivingSocial’s back—or is on its back, as the case may be—as Groupon is continuing to carve out its own path.
Whether that path leads to profits for Groupon or LivingSocial, and how and when that will be achieved, is the news that will really turn heads.
Teresa Novellino writes for Portfolio.com
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





