Recent Blog Posts
-
Tesla Tests Crossover Market With Model X
Feb 10 20123:50 pm EDT -
Groupon Keeps 'Em Guessing
Feb 09 20128:27 am EDT -
When Business Takes a Same-Sex Marriage Vow
Feb 07 20127:16 pm EDT -
Klout Looks to Take Influence Local
Feb 07 20124:07 pm EDT -
Netflix Faces a Fresh Rival
Feb 06 20122:41 pm EDT -
LivingSocial Losses Shouldn’t Shock
Feb 02 20123:28 pm EDT -
Big Primping at Gilt City
Feb 02 201211:42 am EDT -
How About a Raise?
Jan 31 201211:09 am EDT -
Show Us Your (Wild, Bold, Extreme) Cards
Jan 30 20122:54 pm EDT -
Is Groupon a Daily Deal Bully?
Jan 30 201211:51 am EDT
Fannie and Freddie: Pay for Perseverance
It's no wonder that feet dragged when it came to disclosing the specifics of what government-rescued mortgage financers Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are paying to make sure their employees stick around.
It's $210 million. About a fourth already was paid out last year, and another $159 million will be paid out this year and next, according to a letter from the companies' government regulator, James B. Lockhart, who heads the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight.
The money details have been hush-hush, especially after the wave of public fury that followed the $165 million that another government ward, American International Group, paid in employee retention bonuses.
Fannie and Freddie lost almost $110 billion last year, although Lockhart was quick to assure the Senate Finance Committee that the current crop of bonuses will not be paid "to senior executives based on 2008 performance."
Thousands of employees, though, will get cash awards as part of a plan "that targeted employees most critical to keep and difficult to replace," Lockhart said.
No names were given - that would violate privacy and safety, he said - but some 20 Fannie employees received more than $100,000 each, and about the same number of Freddie employees received the same amount or more.
One bit of good news: the bonus plan, which was designed with compensation adviser Hay Group, requires employees to meet "at least one performance obligation and, in some cases, two" in 2009 and 2010.
No details about exactly what that means, and no explanations forthcoming from the two companies.
Oh, and the $165 million is a drop in the bucket - only about .01 or .02 percent - of the 2009 in taxpayer-financed loan purchases and guarantees, Lockhart said. If that makes anyone feel any better.
by Elizabeth Olson
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.




