Recent Blog Posts
-
When Call-Center Scripts Go Bad
May 25 20128:38 am EDT -
Zynga on the Defense
May 24 20123:02 pm EDT -
Facebook Fallout Includes PR Fail
May 24 20129:25 am EDT -
Space Drama to Be Continued
May 21 20129:42 am EDT -
What Made Groupon Go Pop?
May 18 20129:34 am EDT -
Study Finds Millennials are Underbanked
May 17 201212:35 pm EDT -
Mad Men Not Impressed With Facebook IPO
May 17 201210:13 am EDT -
Pricing Experiment in Progress
May 16 201211:02 am EDT -
Did I Tweet That Out Loud?
May 15 20129:44 am EDT -
Revenge of the Liberal Arts Major
May 14 20122:58 pm EDT
Apple "McCains" Microsoft in New Ad
Ad spending has become the Bill Ayers of the Mac verses PC rivalry.
The latest commercial in Apple's "Get a Mac" campaign attacks Microsoft for spending too much money on advertising Windows and not enough on fixing what Apple says are Vista's problems.
But just like the overblown presidential campaign accusations about former Weatherman leader Ayers, it's important to read the fine print. So here are a few facts.
The "Bean Counter" ad -- made by TBWA\Media Arts Lab, Los Angeles, and debuted on Sunday night -- opens with the stodgy PC character dividing up a stack of cash. One pile is huge and devoted to advertising. The other, very small stack is meant to "fix Vista," a Microsoft operating system.
"Do you really think that amount of money is going to help fix Vista?" says the younger and cooler Mac character.
"I guess you're right," PC says. "I'll just put it all in advertising."
Great gag. It is meant to undercut the major campaign that Microsoft launched just last month with its agency, Crispin Porter + Bogusky, to counter Apple's campaign, which sought to cast PC users as dullards willing to settle for second best.
The Microsoft ads attracted a ton of attention by pairing comedian Jerry Seinfeld with Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates in a few teaser ads.
Startlingly, two weeks into the campaign, the Microsoft ads drastically changed; Seinfeld disappeared. This drew yet more media attention.
Were those Microsoft ads effective enough to parry some of Apple's attack? Or is Apply using a little advertising jiu-jitsu to use Microsoft's advantage -- the size of its ad budget -- as a weapon against it? One clue is whether Microsoft really does spend too much on advertising. Another is how its budget compares to Apple's.
Let's see. According to Microsoft's most recent annual Securities and Exchange Commission filing, Microsoft spent $1.2 billion on advertising in fiscal year 2008. That's 1.986 percent of its annual revenue of $60.4 billion.
Now let's check in on Apple. In its most recent annual filing, the company spent $467 million on advertising during fiscal 2007. And that's ... wait for it ... 1.945 percent of it's annual sales of $24 billion. Pretty close!
Okay, so what about research and development costs? In fiscal 2008, Microsoft spent $8.2 billion, or 14 percent of its revenue. Apple, meanwhile, spent $782 million, or just 3 percent of its net sales.
It looks like Apple is pulling a fast one. Apple spends just as much of its revenue on advertising as Microsoft does, but it spends a significantly smaller portion of its sales on R&D. Gotcha!
by Willow Duttge
Also on Portfolio.com:
- Why America's Favorite Gadget Is Doomed
- Pain at a Leading Genomics Firm Signals Trouble for Others
- A New Fitness Gimmick Is Hitting Gyms Across the Country
- Credit Crunched: A Special Report on Wall Street Chaos
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





