Recent Blog Posts
-
When Call-Center Scripts Go Bad
May 25 20128:38 am EDT -
Zynga on the Defense
May 24 20123:02 pm EDT -
Facebook Fallout Includes PR Fail
May 24 20129:25 am EDT -
Space Drama to Be Continued
May 21 20129:42 am EDT -
What Made Groupon Go Pop?
May 18 20129:34 am EDT -
Study Finds Millennials are Underbanked
May 17 201212:35 pm EDT -
Mad Men Not Impressed With Facebook IPO
May 17 201210:13 am EDT -
Pricing Experiment in Progress
May 16 201211:02 am EDT -
Did I Tweet That Out Loud?
May 15 20129:44 am EDT -
Revenge of the Liberal Arts Major
May 14 20122:58 pm EDT
I Fell Asleep on the Keyboard and Got This Headline
Patent infringement lawsuits can make some bold claims. But few can top a complaint recently filed against the Japanese electronics maker Fujitsu in federal court in Manhattan.
A company called LinkCo contends that Fujitsu perpetrated a huge fraud during an earlier patent infringement case. In 2002, a jury awarded LinkCo $3.5 million in damages, an amount based on a single product, sold in Japan that was unprofitable. The two sides reached a settlement the next year.
Now LinkCo alleges that the actual theft of trade secrets was not just the one product, but information that is "the cornerstone of billions of dollars of business for Fujitsu." The defendants "conducted a brazen, international scheme to defraud the plaintiff and to commit fraud on this court."
The complaint contends that Fujitsu controlled witnesses, suppressed documents, suppressed the identities of witnesses, forged documents, and used technological tricks to hide data and make it inaccessible by conventional means.
And just how did LinkCo uncover this audacious scheme years afterward? A drunken party guest and dumb luck.
Here's LinkCo's tale: A principal of the company, David Israel-Rosen, was at a party and encountered someone who was drunk and offered an apology for his company's work on litigation support for Fujitsu, which he suggested "presented some kind of conflict or was improper."
So Israel-Rosen went searching on Fujitsu's Web site. He fell asleep on the keyboard and "inadvertently highlighted" English language translations that were ordinarily white text on white background but when highlighted revealed "the true nation and extent of Fujutsu's product development and promotions," according to the complaint.
"Fujitsu used these devices on the internet to impede discovery by non-Japanese language readers," asserts LinkCo, which is seeking $850 million in damages.
Quite a tale. But as famed trial lawyer David Boies has been known to say, "It's better to be lucky than smart." In the LinkCo complaint, drafted by Peter T. Shapiro of the law firm Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, the adverb "serendipitously" is used to describe the konking out at the computer.
Karen Donovan
Also on Portfolio.com:
- Who Got Screwed by the Wall Street Bailout?
- The Most Generous Families in America
- Can W Succeed Even Though W Failed?
- Credit Crunched: A Special Report on Wall Street Chaos
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





