Recent Blog Posts
-
When Call-Center Scripts Go Bad
May 25 20128:38 am EDT -
Zynga on the Defense
May 24 20123:02 pm EDT -
Facebook Fallout Includes PR Fail
May 24 20129:25 am EDT -
Space Drama to Be Continued
May 21 20129:42 am EDT -
What Made Groupon Go Pop?
May 18 20129:34 am EDT -
Study Finds Millennials are Underbanked
May 17 201212:35 pm EDT -
Mad Men Not Impressed With Facebook IPO
May 17 201210:13 am EDT -
Pricing Experiment in Progress
May 16 201211:02 am EDT -
Did I Tweet That Out Loud?
May 15 20129:44 am EDT -
Revenge of the Liberal Arts Major
May 14 20122:58 pm EDT
The Crazy, Upside Down World of Credit Swaps
Why did credit default swaps on Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs rise today? The cost to insure Morgan Stanley's debt rose by 50 basis points to 480 while Goldman's cost rose by 40 basis points to 240. A Clusterstock headline screams "Morgan Stanley In Trouble Again." Heck, even Merrill Lynch, which received regulatory approval today to go ahead with its Bank of America merger, saw its credit defaults swaps go up by 20 basis points according to Reuters.
The higher the cost of the swaps, the more likely investors think the underlying company will default on its debt. Why are investors suddenly convinced (again) that the investment banks will fail?
Reuters cites an erroneous report from the American Bankers Association that said the banks would not be eligible for the new F.D.I.C. program that guarantees bank debt as a possible reason for their weak performance. This mistake was included in a downloadable Q&A on the Treasury's recapitalization plan yesterday. It was corrected on ABA's web site today.
It's hard to believe that many investors in the credit default swap market were misled by an association's backgrounder for the public.
It's true that the market tanked today, Ben Bernanke uttered more sobering words, and dismal economic data released this morning offered even more evidence that a long and painful recession lies ahead. That would explain why the share prices of Morgan and Goldman fell today. But their credit default swaps?
We've asked this many times during the recent weeks of turmoil, but we have to ask again. WTF?
It should be obvious now that the Treasury Department doesn't plan to have another Lehman Brothers on its hands. The government is now a major stakeholder of these firms, and in many ways it also still controls their fate. Would Paulson let Morgan Stanley go bankrupt? No. Will Bank of America back out on its planned acquisition of Merrill Lynch? Hell no.
So, what's this insight that the credit market has into the future of Goldman, Morgan, and Merrill?
Anyone?
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.
