Pay to Play, er, Go Away
Much is said and written about how much companies should pay good executives to stay. Here's how much one company paid a bad executive to go away.
As noted last week, InfoGroup, a keeper of mailing lists, sales leads, and other databases, agreed to part ways with its founder, Vinod Gupta.
The separation was in no small part to settle shareholder lawsuits over the way he ran the firm. (A pair of investment firms had accused Gupta of having InfoGroup provide him with homes, corporate jets, and luxury cars, and to lease these perks from companies wholly owned by ... yep, Vinod Gupta.)
Just how eager were the irritated investors to get rid of Gupta? As Footnoted.org blogger Michelle Leder notes today, plenty eager. InfoGroup agreed to pay its erstwhile executive $10 million in severance, which more than offsets the $9 million that Gupta had already agreed to pay back to the company.
His true haul, however, is more than the $1 million difference in those figures.
Under the terms of his separation agreement, Gupta will receive his $10 million in two lump sums: Half right away, the rest at the end of June 2009.
But he'll have to pay back the company much more slowly. Under a separate stipulation of settlement, Gupta will have to pay InfoGroup $2.2 million right away, and the rest spread over the next four years.
Since InfoGroup will pay Gupta much faster than he pays the company, he will benefit from what amount to interest-free short-term loans of as much as $5.6 million from InfoGroup.
But wait! There's more!
Gupta's agreement to quit his company greatly benefited his personal investment portfolio: According to the company's most recent proxy statement, Gupta owns about 40 percent of the company's stock; on the day InfoGroup announced his departure, the shares jumped 19 percent.
Roughly speaking, then, his own ouster gave Gupta a paper gain of $21.9 million in a single day. And the stock has continued to rise since then. His stock in the company has increased in value by more than $24.5 million.
Maybe he should have fired himself sooner.
by Mark Stein
Loading...
Thank you for registering as a Portfolio.com Insider. Your comment has been added.
Create Your Public Profile- ACBJ to relaunch Portfolio.com
- May 20 2009 1:44PM EDT
- 44, Day 97: On Golf, Swine Flu, and a "Hallmark Holiday"
- Apr 26 2009 5:39PM EDT
- 44, Day 96: Where's the Suggestion Box?
- Apr 25 2009 2:10PM EDT
- 44, Day 95: Let Them Have Student Loans
- Apr 24 2009 6:49PM EDT
- Stressing Out Over Stress Tests
- Apr 24 2009 2:14PM EDT
- King of the Private Equity Hill
- Apr 24 2009 8:23AM EDT
- 44, Day 94: What's in Obama's Wallet?
- Apr 23 2009 6:39PM EDT
- Madoff Clawback Campaign Targets Ex-Clients
- Apr 23 2009 3:00PM EDT
- Merrill, Muzzle, and the Mob
- Apr 23 2009 1:45PM EDT
- 44, Day 93: Earthly Concerns
- Apr 22 2009 7:14PM EDT
- Stanford Prosecutor Arrested for Assault
- Apr 22 2009 5:47PM EDT
- IMF Downgrades the Global Economy
- Apr 22 2009 2:00PM EDT
- Ackman Opens His Target Slate to Questions
- Apr 22 2009 11:51AM EDT
- Freddie Mac Acting CFO Found Dead
- Apr 22 2009 8:42AM EDT
- 44, Day 92: About Those Interrogations
- Apr 21 2009 5:53PM EDT






