Recent Blog Posts
-
Tesla Tests Crossover Market With Model X
Feb 10 20123:50 pm EDT -
Groupon Keeps 'Em Guessing
Feb 09 20128:27 am EDT -
When Business Takes a Same-Sex Marriage Vow
Feb 07 20127:16 pm EDT -
Klout Looks to Take Influence Local
Feb 07 20124:07 pm EDT -
Netflix Faces a Fresh Rival
Feb 06 20122:41 pm EDT -
LivingSocial Losses Shouldn’t Shock
Feb 02 20123:28 pm EDT -
Big Primping at Gilt City
Feb 02 201211:42 am EDT -
How About a Raise?
Jan 31 201211:09 am EDT -
Show Us Your (Wild, Bold, Extreme) Cards
Jan 30 20122:54 pm EDT -
Is Groupon a Daily Deal Bully?
Jan 30 201211:51 am EDT
Money Talks on This Phone
The blogosphere is abuzz about a very unusual iPhone application for sale in the iTunes store: "I Am Rich," an app that costs $999.99 and does nothing but display a blinking red light on your iPhone.
The cheeky little application -- created by a German programmer named Armin Heinrich -- has caused a stir amongst internet commenters.
"I am Rich?" More like 'I'm a douchebag,' " writes one commenter on TechCrunch.
"I am waiting for the $4.99 Chinese Knock-off I am Rich," says another commenter on Wired's Gadget Lab blog. "Then, and only then will I be able to impress my friends with my perceived wealth and wasteful spending ways."
As of now, the point may be moot, as 'I Am Rich' is no longer showing up in the iTunes store. Calls to Apple to determine the details of its removal weren't immediately returned.
But for all those out there bewailing this application as proof that we have reached some new height in conspicuous consumption and ghastly materialism, rest assured that it's really just a natural progression of what Marcel Duchamp started with the porcelain urinal in 1917, and Andy Warhol advanced so memorably with his Campbell's soup cans and Brillo boxes.
Conceptual artists have been producing tongue-in-cheek comments about the commoditization of art for over a century, largely by producing and selling works of art that have little or no material value or evident craftsmanship.
In 1961, for example, Robert Rauschenberg was supposed to exhibit a portrait in the Galerie Iris Clert, and instead submitted as his contribution a telegram sent to the gallery declaring, "This is a portrait of Iris Clert if I say so."
How does a useless thousand-dollar iPhone app really differ from the shark suspended in formaldehyde (Damien Hirst) or a shovel leaning against a wall (Marcel Duchamp) that would command many times that sum in a gallery setting?
Andy Warhol was perhaps the artist who explored the irrational relationship between art and money most aggressively. He began to paint images of dollar bills in the early 1960's, producing entire canvases consisting of rows of dollar bills.
"I like money on the wall," Warhol said. "Say you were going to buy a $200,000 painting. I think you should take that money, tie it up, and hang it on the wall. Then when someone visited you, the first thing they would see is the money on the wall."
Liz Gunnison
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.




