Recent Blog Posts
-
When Call-Center Scripts Go Bad
May 25 20128:38 am EDT -
Zynga on the Defense
May 24 20123:02 pm EDT -
Facebook Fallout Includes PR Fail
May 24 20129:25 am EDT -
Space Drama to Be Continued
May 21 20129:42 am EDT -
What Made Groupon Go Pop?
May 18 20129:34 am EDT -
Study Finds Millennials are Underbanked
May 17 201212:35 pm EDT -
Mad Men Not Impressed With Facebook IPO
May 17 201210:13 am EDT -
Pricing Experiment in Progress
May 16 201211:02 am EDT -
Did I Tweet That Out Loud?
May 15 20129:44 am EDT -
Revenge of the Liberal Arts Major
May 14 20122:58 pm EDT
The Perils of Being a Bear
The Bear Stearns rescue continues to be a flashpoint in the markets. While the equity holders were hurt, critics say that's a side issue and have focused on the moral hazard of bailing out the Bear Stearns creditors in the midst of a credit bubble.
Today, David Evans, crack investigative reporter for Bloomberg, has an opus on the area many people think will be the next big blowup: Credit default swaps.
In one section of the piece, Evans makes an interesting point. Because Bear was shepherded into the hands of J.P. Morgan — initially for just $2 a share, later raised to $10 — rather than forced into bankruptcy, there was no default event. Evans continues:
"While that's devastating news for Bear shareholders — the stock had traded at $62.30 just a week earlier — it's the best news imaginable for owners of Bear debt. That's because JPMorgan agreed to cover Bear's liabilities, with the Fed pledging $29 billion to cover Bear's loan obligations.
"For traders who sold protection on Bear's debt, the bailout is a godsend. Faced with the prospect of having to hand over untold millions to their counterparties just three days earlier, they now have to pay out nothing."For traders who bought protection swaps just a few days earlier — when prices were in the 600s to 800s — the Fed bailout is crushing. Their investments have turned to dust."
In other words, the Fed's rescue of Bear Stearns didn't just help imprudent lenders to an overleveraged investment bank that had overly exposed itself to dodgy mortgage markets, it actually harmed prudent buyers of insurance (and, I should add, the speculators who hoped to profit from Bear's demise).
by Jesse Eisinger
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





