Recent Blog Posts
-
The Era of the Renminbi Is at Hand
Nov 20 20092:55 pm EDT -
Computer Glitch Snarls Air Traffic
Nov 19 200910:29 am EDT -
Dollar Doldrums? What Dollar Doldrums?
Nov 19 20098:48 am EDT -
American Express Makes a Revolutionary Deal
Nov 18 200912:05 pm EDT -
Calpers Puts Pressure on Private Equity Funding and Fees
Nov 18 200910:27 am EDT -
Madoff Makes Millions (for Others)
Nov 18 20096:04 am EDT -
Lazard Looks Within Its Ranks for New Chief
Nov 17 20091:44 pm EDT -
A Brutal Morning for Geithner
Nov 17 20098:02 am EDT -
GM to Start Payback
Nov 16 20095:57 am EDT -
She Rules
Nov 13 200910:48 pm EDT
Rest Easy. C.E.O. Pay Is Holding Up
Things may not be hunky-dory for companies or the investors who own them, but chief executive compensation is holding fast.
Indeed, according to the compensation consultants at Equilar, median C.E.O. pay rose by 1.3 percent, to a still comfortable $8,828,589, last year.
Equilar, based in Redwood Shores, California, came up with those figures by reviewing the proxy statements of 233 members of the S&P 500-stock index.
In the prior two year period — 2005 to 2006 — median C.E.O. compensation increased significantly more: 6 percent. But Equilar said that study, of 194 S&P 500 chief executives, was similar but not identical to its latest one.
The slowing in growth of median chief executive pay levels, the benchmarking firm found in its latest study, is due to fewer annual performance-based bonuses and stock option awards.
In 2007, the chief executives studied received a median aggregate bonus of $1.83 million, down 4.9 percent from the 2006 median of $1.93 million. Also, the prevalence of bonus compensation fell from 96.6 percent in 2006 to 88.4 percent last year. As a result, the study concluded that total bonus compensation for all such chief executives fell by 4.7 percent from 2006 to 2007.
The value of options awards also slid somewhat — by 0.7 percent — from $2.29 million to $2.27 million from 2006 to 2007, Equilar found. And such awards were given less often, falling from 76.4 percent in 2006 to 71.2 percent the following year.
by Elizabeth Olson






