Recent Blog Posts
-
When Call-Center Scripts Go Bad
May 25 20128:38 am EDT -
Zynga on the Defense
May 24 20123:02 pm EDT -
Facebook Fallout Includes PR Fail
May 24 20129:25 am EDT -
Space Drama to Be Continued
May 21 20129:42 am EDT -
What Made Groupon Go Pop?
May 18 20129:34 am EDT -
Study Finds Millennials are Underbanked
May 17 201212:35 pm EDT -
Mad Men Not Impressed With Facebook IPO
May 17 201210:13 am EDT -
Pricing Experiment in Progress
May 16 201211:02 am EDT -
Did I Tweet That Out Loud?
May 15 20129:44 am EDT -
Revenge of the Liberal Arts Major
May 14 20122:58 pm EDT
A C.E.O. Feels His Shareholders' Pain
Unclear whether this is a trend or just a blip on the compensation screen, but Lennar Corp.'s chief executive forfeited his $9.95 million bonus because the homebuilder did not meet its profit goals.
Like other builders, Lennar, the third largest in the country, is struggling in the sagging housing market. The company, based in Miami, reported a $1.9 billion loss for 2007.
Last year started out much sunnier. In February, the company's board granted C.E.O. Stuart A. Miller a restricted stock bonus worth $9.95 million — in addition to his salary (and perks — see below).
But as the Associated Press found, company filings distributed at today's annual shareholders meeting show that Miller received no cash bonus "as a result of the company's failure to earn a profit for the fiscal year."
Also, Lennar's proxy said three top officers "forfeited significant equity grants as a result of the company's failure to achieve certain financial performance goals."
There was no immediate comment from Lennar on Miller's compensation, although the company's proxy statement shows that he still owns 68 percent of Lennar and did receive his $1 million salary, $96,000 in dividends on restricted stock the company already holds in his name, $26,547 in auto lease payments, and assorted other benefits.
Shareholders, on the other hand, lost 56 cents per share in the first quarter of this year, as Lennar's revenues from home sales plunged 64 percent.
Still, at least Lennar didn't follow the example of rival Toll Brothers.
Robert I. Toll, the C.E.O. of that Horsham, Pennsylvania, homebuilder also went without a bonus in 2007. But the company changed its bonus criteria in the future so that they won't be contingent on boring old metrics like, say, profits.
by Elizabeth Olson
- This item was amended to make clear that Lennar didn't follow Toll Brothers' lead in executive compensation. —Editor
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





