Recent Blog Posts
-
When Call-Center Scripts Go Bad
May 25 20128:38 am EDT -
Zynga on the Defense
May 24 20123:02 pm EDT -
Facebook Fallout Includes PR Fail
May 24 20129:25 am EDT -
Space Drama to Be Continued
May 21 20129:42 am EDT -
What Made Groupon Go Pop?
May 18 20129:34 am EDT -
Study Finds Millennials are Underbanked
May 17 201212:35 pm EDT -
Mad Men Not Impressed With Facebook IPO
May 17 201210:13 am EDT -
Pricing Experiment in Progress
May 16 201211:02 am EDT -
Did I Tweet That Out Loud?
May 15 20129:44 am EDT -
Revenge of the Liberal Arts Major
May 14 20122:58 pm EDT
It's the Math, Stupid
When does 1+1=5?
Apparently, when an alarming number of companies file director compensation totals with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
During the 2007 proxy season, 126 firms out of 2,000 failed to do the simple math when filing director compensations totals, according to a new study published by The Corporate Library, an independent research firm.
Discrepancies ranged from $1 dollar — companies may have been rounding up in these cases — to $125,000, the report adds.
"The discrepancies are due to bad mathematics and inattention to detail," Paul Hodgson, a senior researcher at The Corporate Library, told Portfolio.com.
Missing columns, ignoring certain data points, and transposing figures all accounted for the fuzzy math, it seems. Compensation totals for California Water Service Group's seven-director board should add up to $620,686, for example, the report notes. Instead, the company reported a total of $488,806, a difference of $18,840 per director.
Companies were as likely to report high totals as they were to report low ones, which suggests firms had no corrupt motives when filing their reports.
"The numbers indicate there were no nefarious goings on," said Hodgson.
This is the first year that firms were required to prepare and file director compensation tables with the S.E.C., Hodgson pointed out, which may account for the cloudy calculations.
"Companies may have pushed this to the bottom of the pile and not given it the attention you would expect," said Hodgson.
Nonetheless, the report comes away with some clear questions.
"Why, in an age when you can key numbers into a spreadsheet and use a simple formula to add them with perfect accuracy, did 126 companies have total compensation columns that did not accurately reflect the sum of its table components?" asked the report's author, Greg Ruel. "How could such basic addition mistakes go unnoticed and uncorrected?"
The report's conclusion underlined the need for improved diligence and higher levels of scrutiny for board financial disclosures, noting the vulnerability of important data by which pay policies are evaluated and critiqued.
by Alfonso Serrano F.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





