Recent Blog Posts
-
Tesla Tests Crossover Market With Model X
Feb 10 20123:50 pm EDT -
Groupon Keeps 'Em Guessing
Feb 09 20128:27 am EDT -
When Business Takes a Same-Sex Marriage Vow
Feb 07 20127:16 pm EDT -
Klout Looks to Take Influence Local
Feb 07 20124:07 pm EDT -
Netflix Faces a Fresh Rival
Feb 06 20122:41 pm EDT -
LivingSocial Losses Shouldn’t Shock
Feb 02 20123:28 pm EDT -
Big Primping at Gilt City
Feb 02 201211:42 am EDT -
How About a Raise?
Jan 31 201211:09 am EDT -
Show Us Your (Wild, Bold, Extreme) Cards
Jan 30 20122:54 pm EDT -
Is Groupon a Daily Deal Bully?
Jan 30 201211:51 am EDT
The Comcast Mystery Deepens
The organizer of a public hearing on net neutrality said she's skeptical of Comcast's argument that it paid people merely to hold places for Comcast employees who would arrive later.
Catherine Bracy of Harvard said about three-dozen placeholders entered the hearing, a public forum at which the Federal Communications Commission sought public comment on Comcast's policy of slowing or blocking some internet traffic on its network. Most left after the first panel. Some slept through the proceedings.
Comcast spokesman Charlie Douglas told the blog Ars Technica that the company "did pay some individuals to stand in line and hold seats for Comcast employees." He said it was a "common practice" in Washington.
Bracy, however, said that doesn't jibe with what she saw at the hearing. "They didn't get up to leave in order to let Comcast employees sit there," said Bracy, administrative manager at Harvard's Berkman Center for Internet and Society. "There were no Comcast employees waiting to get in. The people who were waiting to get into the room were regular citizens waiting to get into a public hearing."
With the room packed, Bracy said that she and other Harvard staffers had no choice but to turn other members of the public away.
"We were really disapointed that we couldn't let more people into the room," Bracy added. "Then we learned that Comcast was paying people to fill up seats."
The F.C.C. is reviewing Comcast's practice of slowing down or blocking the delivery of some internet content over its cable network. The company says it is engaging only in prudent network management, but critics have accused it of trying to hobble rivals in the video-on-demand business.
The practice has already attracted the attention of Congress and the New York attorney general's office as well as the F.C.C. All have opened separate investigations of the practice.
It has also prompted some customers to sue, and led to the creation of an ad hoc coalition of academics and other free-speech advocates to push regulators to prevent cable operators and phone companies from slowing or blocking the delivery of targeted internet content over their systems.
by Sam Gustin
Photograph: A Harvard University police officer prevents people from entering an overcrowded meeting room where the Federal Communication Commission was holding a public hearing on Monday. Comcast, the cable company that was the subject of the hearing, said it hired some people to fill seats at the event; event organizers said that prevented some company critics from attending. Photograph by Stephan Savoia/Associated Press
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.




