Recent Blog Posts
-
When Call-Center Scripts Go Bad
May 25 20128:38 am EDT -
Zynga on the Defense
May 24 20123:02 pm EDT -
Facebook Fallout Includes PR Fail
May 24 20129:25 am EDT -
Space Drama to Be Continued
May 21 20129:42 am EDT -
What Made Groupon Go Pop?
May 18 20129:34 am EDT -
Study Finds Millennials are Underbanked
May 17 201212:35 pm EDT -
Mad Men Not Impressed With Facebook IPO
May 17 201210:13 am EDT -
Pricing Experiment in Progress
May 16 201211:02 am EDT -
Did I Tweet That Out Loud?
May 15 20129:44 am EDT -
Revenge of the Liberal Arts Major
May 14 20122:58 pm EDT
The Comcast Mystery Deepens
The organizer of a public hearing on net neutrality said she's skeptical of Comcast's argument that it paid people merely to hold places for Comcast employees who would arrive later.
Catherine Bracy of Harvard said about three-dozen placeholders entered the hearing, a public forum at which the Federal Communications Commission sought public comment on Comcast's policy of slowing or blocking some internet traffic on its network. Most left after the first panel. Some slept through the proceedings.
Comcast spokesman Charlie Douglas told the blog Ars Technica that the company "did pay some individuals to stand in line and hold seats for Comcast employees." He said it was a "common practice" in Washington.
Bracy, however, said that doesn't jibe with what she saw at the hearing. "They didn't get up to leave in order to let Comcast employees sit there," said Bracy, administrative manager at Harvard's Berkman Center for Internet and Society. "There were no Comcast employees waiting to get in. The people who were waiting to get into the room were regular citizens waiting to get into a public hearing."
With the room packed, Bracy said that she and other Harvard staffers had no choice but to turn other members of the public away.
"We were really disapointed that we couldn't let more people into the room," Bracy added. "Then we learned that Comcast was paying people to fill up seats."
The F.C.C. is reviewing Comcast's practice of slowing down or blocking the delivery of some internet content over its cable network. The company says it is engaging only in prudent network management, but critics have accused it of trying to hobble rivals in the video-on-demand business.
The practice has already attracted the attention of Congress and the New York attorney general's office as well as the F.C.C. All have opened separate investigations of the practice.
It has also prompted some customers to sue, and led to the creation of an ad hoc coalition of academics and other free-speech advocates to push regulators to prevent cable operators and phone companies from slowing or blocking the delivery of targeted internet content over their systems.
by Sam Gustin
Photograph: A Harvard University police officer prevents people from entering an overcrowded meeting room where the Federal Communication Commission was holding a public hearing on Monday. Comcast, the cable company that was the subject of the hearing, said it hired some people to fill seats at the event; event organizers said that prevented some company critics from attending. Photograph by Stephan Savoia/Associated Press
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





