Recent Blog Posts
-
The Era of the Renminbi Is at Hand
Nov 20 20092:55 pm EDT -
Computer Glitch Snarls Air Traffic
Nov 19 200910:29 am EDT -
Dollar Doldrums? What Dollar Doldrums?
Nov 19 20098:48 am EDT -
American Express Makes a Revolutionary Deal
Nov 18 200912:05 pm EDT -
Calpers Puts Pressure on Private Equity Funding and Fees
Nov 18 200910:27 am EDT -
Madoff Makes Millions (for Others)
Nov 18 20096:04 am EDT -
Lazard Looks Within Its Ranks for New Chief
Nov 17 20091:44 pm EDT -
A Brutal Morning for Geithner
Nov 17 20098:02 am EDT -
GM to Start Payback
Nov 16 20095:57 am EDT -
She Rules
Nov 13 200910:48 pm EDT
Another Offshore Entity in the Enron Case
As they negotiated a plea deal with Enron prosecutors, the so-called NatWest Three agreed to serve three years and a month in a federal prison. But they may wind up serving much less time, even though there is no parole in the federal system.
How? They could petition to transfer to a penitentiary in their home country, where British law would allow for parole after they had served half their sentence. Such prisoner transfers to jails in their country of origin is not uncommon, according to the U.S. Bureau of Prisons.
Indeed, former Enron executive, David W. Delainey, a Canadian citizen, who pleaded guilty to insider trading was transferred to a Canadian prison last June after serving nine months of a two and a half year sentence. Canadian law also allows for parole.
"It all started with treaties we signed with Mexico to get back U.S. nationals who were convicted of crimes in Mexican courts," said Jordan Paust, professor of international law at the University of Houston.
Similar reciprocal treaties with other nations followed. Sending prisoners back home where they'd get a lesser sentence, he said, "wasn't the original intent."
by Kate Murphy






