Recent Blog Posts
-
When Call-Center Scripts Go Bad
May 25 20128:38 am EDT -
Zynga on the Defense
May 24 20123:02 pm EDT -
Facebook Fallout Includes PR Fail
May 24 20129:25 am EDT -
Space Drama to Be Continued
May 21 20129:42 am EDT -
What Made Groupon Go Pop?
May 18 20129:34 am EDT -
Study Finds Millennials are Underbanked
May 17 201212:35 pm EDT -
Mad Men Not Impressed With Facebook IPO
May 17 201210:13 am EDT -
Pricing Experiment in Progress
May 16 201211:02 am EDT -
Did I Tweet That Out Loud?
May 15 20129:44 am EDT -
Revenge of the Liberal Arts Major
May 14 20122:58 pm EDT
A Golden Handshake
If the Merrill Lynch board votes to show Stanley O'Neal the exit door, how big will his last check be? It all depends on how the board spins it.
According to the company's most recent proxy filing, if O'Neal is terminated without a change in control of Merrill Lynch, it will be up to the board's compensation committee to determine his severance pay.
But life would have been very sweet if O'Neal's job had been terminated after a change in control of the company. Based on his 2006 compensation package, O'Neal would have walked away with severance benefits of $29.5 million, and accelerated stock compensation of $221.8 million, if the company's control changed.
What if the overture to Wachovia had led to a merger? Wachovia is the bigger of the two companies, but it's not clear that a deal would have triggered a change in control provision. Still, $251 million is certainly big enough to drive a person to at least ask.
O'Neal has been among the better compensated Wall Street executives in recent years. He received $48 million in 2006, up 40 percent from the salary, stock, and bonus he got in 2005, although short of the $54 million that Lloyd Blankfein of Goldman Sachs earned.
If the board spins his departure as an early retirement, O'Neal could still walk out with enough to keep his head high. The chief executive was 55 as of the March 2007 proxy filing, which is precisely the age at which the Merrill Lynch board permits executive retirement with benefits. He would be entitled to a $24.8 million pension benefit, in addition to the $4.8 million in non-qualified deferred compensation he's accumulated.
Megan Barnett
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





