Recent Blog Posts
-
Tesla Tests Crossover Market With Model X
Feb 10 20123:50 pm EDT -
Groupon Keeps 'Em Guessing
Feb 09 20128:27 am EDT -
When Business Takes a Same-Sex Marriage Vow
Feb 07 20127:16 pm EDT -
Klout Looks to Take Influence Local
Feb 07 20124:07 pm EDT -
Netflix Faces a Fresh Rival
Feb 06 20122:41 pm EDT -
LivingSocial Losses Shouldn’t Shock
Feb 02 20123:28 pm EDT -
Big Primping at Gilt City
Feb 02 201211:42 am EDT -
How About a Raise?
Jan 31 201211:09 am EDT -
Show Us Your (Wild, Bold, Extreme) Cards
Jan 30 20122:54 pm EDT -
Is Groupon a Daily Deal Bully?
Jan 30 201211:51 am EDT
Payback Time for Ahold's Ex-Executives
Clawback arrangements are becoming increasingly common. But few companies have clawed back quite as aggressively as Ahold, the Dutch supermarket operator.
The company, which runs the Stop & Shop and Giant chains in the U.S. among others, said today that its former chief executive and chief financial officers had agreed to refund a total of almost $8 million.
The refunds were not the product of formal clawback provisions—contractual clauses requiring executives to give back any compensation that is later found to be based on phony revenue number or other metrics.
(A recent study by Equilar, the executive compensation consulting firm, found that 42 percent of the publicly traded members of the Fortune 100 disclosed clawback provisions in 2006, compared with about 17 percent in 2005.)
But the Ahold refunds were similar in spirit: A company demanding that ex-executives not benefit from lying about their performances. The paybacks were part of a settlement of employment arbitration cases between the company and former C.E.O. Cees Van der Hoeven and former finance chief Michiel Meurs. Van der Hoeven and Meurs were forced out of the company in 2003, after the discovery of an accounting scandal at the company's wholesale food unit, U.S. Foodservice Inc.
Seven former suppliers pleaded guilty to conspiracy charges after acknowledging that they helped executives meet earnings targets by inflating promotional allowances by $800 million.
Van der Hoeven and Meurs had each filed arbitration claims against Ahold after they left the company. Van der Hoeven said he was owed more than $6 million; Meurs sought $2.8 million. Ahold filed counterclaims, which led to today's settlement.
by Mark Stein
Laura Rich is a co-founder of Recessionwire, which provides news, advice, perspective and humor about the recession and the recovery.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.




