Recent Blog Posts
-
When Call-Center Scripts Go Bad
May 25 20128:38 am EDT -
Zynga on the Defense
May 24 20123:02 pm EDT -
Facebook Fallout Includes PR Fail
May 24 20129:25 am EDT -
Space Drama to Be Continued
May 21 20129:42 am EDT -
What Made Groupon Go Pop?
May 18 20129:34 am EDT -
Study Finds Millennials are Underbanked
May 17 201212:35 pm EDT -
Mad Men Not Impressed With Facebook IPO
May 17 201210:13 am EDT -
Pricing Experiment in Progress
May 16 201211:02 am EDT -
Did I Tweet That Out Loud?
May 15 20129:44 am EDT -
Revenge of the Liberal Arts Major
May 14 20122:58 pm EDT
Fast and Loose . . . and Short
Swiss Re Financial Products Corp., a subsidiary of the world's largest reinsurer, has agreed to pay more than a half million dollars to settle securities regulators' allegations that it illegally short-sold stocks while also taking them public.
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced the settlement with the Swiss Re subsidiary today. The S.E.C. noted that Swiss Re Financial Products hadn't admitted nor denied the commission's findings that it sold securities short within five business days of pricing the I.P.O.'s, then covered the sales, either partially or completely, with shares it got in the offerings.
That is forbidden under a 1996 regulation "intended to prevent manipulative short selling prior to a public offering by short sellers who cover their short positions by purchasing securities in the offering, thus largely avoiding exposure to market risk."
"Such short sales could result in a lower offering price and reduce an issuer's proceeds," the regulation states.
The company, a New York unit of Zurich-based Swiss Re, profited from all but one of 13 transactions between mid-2003 and early 2005, according to the settlement filed in federal court in Manhattan. Federal regulators said traders booked total profits of $380,517.
Among the stocks being shorted were those issued by Estee Lauder, Monster Worldwide, Nextel Partners, Wesco International, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing. The companies themselves were not parties to the trades in question.
In the Nextel case, which regulators said was typical, the Swiss Re company selling short 150,000 shares before covering its position with part of an allocation of 400,000 shares in the offering the next day. It made nearly $80,000, quickly and virtually risk-free.
Federal officials did not name the traders, whom they said worked in New York and London. But the complaint noted that Swiss Re Financial Products no longer employs them.
The settlement calls for the company to pay a $95,000 penalty along with disgorging another $457,605.
Elizabeth Olson
Laura Rich is a co-founder of Recessionwire, which provides news, advice, perspective and humor about the recession and the recovery.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





