Recent Blog Posts
-
Fannie Mae Losses Continue
Nov 06 20096:04 am EDT -
Insider-Trading Case Grows with Arrests
Nov 05 20093:46 pm EDT -
Crisis? What Financial Crisis?
Nov 05 200911:44 am EDT -
Harley Narrows Plant Options
Nov 05 20096:26 am EDT -
Mad Chrysler Men
Nov 04 20096:21 pm EDT
Getting a Grip on Intangibles
As any good student of stock valuations knows, companies are increasingly worth more than the sum of their parts.
In 1982, 62 percent of the public market value of the world's 150 largest companies could be attributed to their tangible assets—things like their buildings, inventory, and equipment.
By 1999, the proportion had fallen to a mere 16 percent, leaving a full 84 percent of a company's value reliant on intangibles. That includes not just patents, trademarks, and other intellectual property, but companies' good names, too.
Those reputations rely on corporate environmental, social, and governance practices. But how to systematically measure and compare those values?
A Bloomberg terminal can slice and dice hard numbers in a flash. How can anyone track squishier stuff like whether a company's supplier in Indonesia meets someone's definition of a sweatshop? That's much harder.
Until, perhaps, now.
Duff McDonald's article on a new firm that quantifies and compares these nonfinancial intangibles for Goldman Sachs and other Wall Street firms can be found here.
Laura Rich is a co-founder of Recessionwire, which provides news, advice, perspective and humor about the recession and the recovery.






