Recent Blog Posts
-
Smoking Lingerie Leads to Lawsuit
Nov 23 20093:11 pm EDT -
Ooops
Nov 23 200912:01 am EDT -
The Era of the Renminbi Is at Hand
Nov 20 20092:55 pm EDT -
Computer Glitch Snarls Air Traffic
Nov 19 200910:29 am EDT -
Dollar Doldrums? What Dollar Doldrums?
Nov 19 20098:48 am EDT -
American Express Makes a Revolutionary Deal
Nov 18 200912:05 pm EDT -
Calpers Puts Pressure on Private Equity Funding and Fees
Nov 18 200910:27 am EDT -
Madoff Makes Millions (for Others)
Nov 18 20096:04 am EDT -
Lazard Looks Within Its Ranks for New Chief
Nov 17 20091:44 pm EDT -
A Brutal Morning for Geithner
Nov 17 20098:02 am EDT
Getting a Grip on Intangibles
As any good student of stock valuations knows, companies are increasingly worth more than the sum of their parts.
In 1982, 62 percent of the public market value of the world's 150 largest companies could be attributed to their tangible assets—things like their buildings, inventory, and equipment.
By 1999, the proportion had fallen to a mere 16 percent, leaving a full 84 percent of a company's value reliant on intangibles. That includes not just patents, trademarks, and other intellectual property, but companies' good names, too.
Those reputations rely on corporate environmental, social, and governance practices. But how to systematically measure and compare those values?
A Bloomberg terminal can slice and dice hard numbers in a flash. How can anyone track squishier stuff like whether a company's supplier in Indonesia meets someone's definition of a sweatshop? That's much harder.
Until, perhaps, now.
Duff McDonald's article on a new firm that quantifies and compares these nonfinancial intangibles for Goldman Sachs and other Wall Street firms can be found here.
Laura Rich is a co-founder of Recessionwire, which provides news, advice, perspective and humor about the recession and the recovery.






