Readin', Writin', and Interest Rates
Standardized tests. Ugh. Kids hate taking them almost as much as the rest of us dread reading the headlines that remind us how much our education system fails us.
We know plenty of 12th graders who can't name the third U.S. president or the chemical elements in carbon dioxide. But who knew we had a bunch of budding Alan Greenspans on our hands?
Last year, high school seniors took the first national assessment test in economics, and the Department of Education released the results today. It turns out that kids know an awful lot about the laws of supply and demand and the effect of rising interest rates on consumer spending habits.
The assessment tests determine if kids have a basic, proficient, or advanced level of knowledge of a particular subject based on their test scores.
An impressive 79 percent of kids performed at or above the basic level in economics, beating out every other subject matter in the most recent years for which data is available.
That compares to basic or better of 73 percent in reading, 66 percent in civics, 61 percent in math, 54 percent in science, and a measly 47 percent in U.S. history.
Not surprisingly, kids with college-educated parents had higher test scores, and students in large city schools underperformed other students.
Boys did better than girls, and the white and Asian/Pacific Islander kids scored higher than other ethnic groups.
The results are especially intriguing because economics was not always part of a typical high school curriculum. Between 1982 and 2005, the percentage of high school graduates who had taken an economics course jumped from 49 percent to 66 percent.
The test was not easy. Only 36 percent of students correctly answered that personal income tax is the largest source of tax revenue for the federal government.
Perhaps because they spend more time shopping at the mall than they do earning a paycheck, 31 percent thought the biggest source was sales tax.
But their sense of the global economic picture was impressive. When asked what would likely happen if there was a decrease in worldwide oil production, a full 63 percent of students correctly answered that economic growth in oil-importing countries would decrease.
The next national economics assessment test will be conducted in 2012, so we'll find out then if this was some anomalous period of pervasive business news making its way into high school conversation.
In the meantime, our 2006 graduates may not develop the next silicon chip or write the definitive Abraham Lincoln biography. But they will get out of college just in time to help solve the coming Social Security crisis.
by Megan Barnett
Loading...
Thank you for registering as a Portfolio.com Insider. Your comment has been added.
Create Your Public Profile- ACBJ to relaunch Portfolio.com
- May 20 2009 1:44PM EDT
- 44, Day 97: On Golf, Swine Flu, and a "Hallmark Holiday"
- Apr 26 2009 5:39PM EDT
- 44, Day 96: Where's the Suggestion Box?
- Apr 25 2009 2:10PM EDT
- 44, Day 95: Let Them Have Student Loans
- Apr 24 2009 6:49PM EDT
- Stressing Out Over Stress Tests
- Apr 24 2009 2:14PM EDT
- King of the Private Equity Hill
- Apr 24 2009 8:23AM EDT
- 44, Day 94: What's in Obama's Wallet?
- Apr 23 2009 6:39PM EDT
- Madoff Clawback Campaign Targets Ex-Clients
- Apr 23 2009 3:00PM EDT
- Merrill, Muzzle, and the Mob
- Apr 23 2009 1:45PM EDT
- 44, Day 93: Earthly Concerns
- Apr 22 2009 7:14PM EDT
- Stanford Prosecutor Arrested for Assault
- Apr 22 2009 5:47PM EDT
- IMF Downgrades the Global Economy
- Apr 22 2009 2:00PM EDT
- Ackman Opens His Target Slate to Questions
- Apr 22 2009 11:51AM EDT
- Freddie Mac Acting CFO Found Dead
- Apr 22 2009 8:42AM EDT
- 44, Day 92: About Those Interrogations
- Apr 21 2009 5:53PM EDT






