Recent Blog Posts
-
When Call-Center Scripts Go Bad
May 25 20128:38 am EDT -
Zynga on the Defense
May 24 20123:02 pm EDT -
Facebook Fallout Includes PR Fail
May 24 20129:25 am EDT -
Space Drama to Be Continued
May 21 20129:42 am EDT -
What Made Groupon Go Pop?
May 18 20129:34 am EDT -
Study Finds Millennials are Underbanked
May 17 201212:35 pm EDT -
Mad Men Not Impressed With Facebook IPO
May 17 201210:13 am EDT -
Pricing Experiment in Progress
May 16 201211:02 am EDT -
Did I Tweet That Out Loud?
May 15 20129:44 am EDT -
Revenge of the Liberal Arts Major
May 14 20122:58 pm EDT
A Russian Tycoon's Private Army
You've heard about Dennis Kozlowski's $6,000 shower curtain and Conrad Black's $40,000 birthday party, but what about Roman Abramovich's $400,000 chief of security?
According to the Sunday Times of London, Russian billionaire Roman Abramovich maintains a 40-man security force fit for a king - or at least a head of state.
And this is not retired or off-duty rent-a-cops either. Abramovich's defense detail is made up of highly skilled professionals, including former solidiers of the S.A.S., Britain's elite commando unit, in addition to Glock-toting bodyguards. Abramovich's primary yacht is equipped with bulletproof glass, a missile detection system, and a helicopter and private submarine that function as escape vehicles.
All told, Abramovich's self-defense regime carries an annual price tag of around $2.4 million. All this for a man whose public appearances largely consist of attending the matches of Chelsea, the London soccer team he bought in 2003.
While Abramovich's safety measures might be unusual for a businessman, The Times notes that the London-based tycoon is not the only high-profile executive who requires a big investment in personal protection. Eric Schmidt, the chief executive of Google, sets his security budget at around $500,000 a year, and Oracle founder Larry Ellison has a $1.8 million budget to maintain his peace of mind.
For executives of publicly held companies, these security tabs might seem a bit rich.
Questions about security budgets, however, rarely get raised. After all, it seems unfair to criticize money spent on personal safety - it is hardly the same thing as throwing away thousands on home decor or elaborate champagne blowouts. And no doubt the continued health and well-being of the executives are of enormous value to the companies and their shareholders.
So just how large does a personal security budget have to be before it stops counting as a legitimate defense measure, and becomes a matter of excess and vanity? Ellison has surely made enemies in Silicon Valley, but does he really need $1.8 billion worth of protection?
Abramovich doesn't have shareholders to question his defense spending.
In Russia, of course, business is done a little differently. Murder and kidnapping attempts on businessmen have not been uncommon. Russian military guards and escape submarines could just be the cost of doing business for an oligarch.
And admittedly, living like James Bond is one heck of a perk.
Liz Gunnison
Laura Rich is a co-founder of Recessionwire, which provides news, advice, perspective and humor about the recession and the recovery.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





