Recent Blog Posts
-
When Call-Center Scripts Go Bad
May 25 20128:38 am EDT -
Zynga on the Defense
May 24 20123:02 pm EDT -
Facebook Fallout Includes PR Fail
May 24 20129:25 am EDT -
Space Drama to Be Continued
May 21 20129:42 am EDT -
What Made Groupon Go Pop?
May 18 20129:34 am EDT -
Study Finds Millennials are Underbanked
May 17 201212:35 pm EDT -
Mad Men Not Impressed With Facebook IPO
May 17 201210:13 am EDT -
Pricing Experiment in Progress
May 16 201211:02 am EDT -
Did I Tweet That Out Loud?
May 15 20129:44 am EDT -
Revenge of the Liberal Arts Major
May 14 20122:58 pm EDT
Imus Punches Back at The Eye
CBS might call itself the most watched U.S. television network of the moment, but CBS Radio is doing its best to rain on the company's profit parade.
On Thursday, CBS reported first-quarter net earnings down 6 percent from a year ago. Revenue at CBS Radio fell 9 percent to $398 million, which went a good way towards canceling out a 2 percent rise in revenue achieved at the much larger television unit.
And CBS radio is soon to have another drag on its bottom line - a lawsuit that the recently dissed and dismissed Don Imus is said to be mounting against his former employer.
According to Fortune magazine, the radio shock jock feels entitled to the $40 million that was still left on his contract when Les Moonves pulled the plug on 'Imus in the Morning' on April 12.
Fortune reports that Imus has already hired blockbuster First Amendment lawyer Martin Garbus and the pair could be filing suit within the month. Imus, who made a career off of his trademark acid-tongued commentary, claims that his contract with CBS implicitly encouraged the use of off-color humor.
He also says that the contract entitled him to one "gimme" if a comment ever crossed the line - in other words, his inflammatory remarks about the Rutgers women's basketball team should not on their own have been sufficient grounds for his firing.
CBS lawyers maintain that Imus was fired with just cause and is not owed the remaining money.
Imus may have a hard time making a case for First Amendment violation due to Federal Communications Commission regulations that apply to speech over the public airwaves; his argument would hinge on whether Imus' comments meet the definition of profanity under FCC guidelines.
Regardless of the outcome, it looks like there will be hefty legal fees on CBS's income statement in the near future.
by Liz Gunnison
Photograph by Richard Drew/Associated Press
Laura Rich is a co-founder of Recessionwire, which provides news, advice, perspective and humor about the recession and the recovery.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





