Recent Blog Posts
-
Startups Tap Government Energy Research
Feb 10 20122:57 pm EDT -
Kauffman Calls for States' Startup Acts
Feb 09 20124:17 pm EDT -
Want to Fund Startups? Look to Tax Break
Feb 07 201211:42 am EDT -
Jack Abramoff Takes to Redemption Trail
Feb 06 20124:23 pm EDT -
Obama Touts Jobs Growth, GOP Unimpressed
Feb 03 20121:21 pm EDT -
Bernanke Takes on Ryan
Over Inflation
Feb 02 20122:06 pm EDT -
Clock Ticks for Startup Bills
Feb 01 20122:36 pm EDT -
A Legislative Agenda for Entrepreneurs
Jan 31 20124:53 pm EDT -
Happy Birthday, Startup America!
Jan 30 20121:16 pm EDT -
White House CTO Calls It Quits
Jan 27 20122:46 pm EDT
Links
- Tapped: The American Prospect

- Marc Ambinder

- National Review

- KausFiles

- firedoglake

- The Politico

- The Daily Dish

- Blogging Heads

- Swampland

- Freakonomics

- Atrios

- Daily Kos

- Real Clear Politics

- The Political Animal

- Power Line

- Instapundit

- Matthew Yglesias

- Drudge Report

- Talking Points Memo

- Huffington Post

- Red State.org

Man of Peace or Man of War?
President Barack Obama, you’ve just won the Nobel Peace Prize. What are you going to do now?
I’m going to meet with my generals and national security team to talk about escalating the war in Afghanistan!
That’s not what Obama said, directly at least, in response to the surprise Nobel announcement. In brief remarks at the Rose Garden, Obama said he was “deeply humbled” and viewed it not as a recognition of his own accomplishments, “but rather as an affirmation of American leadership on behalf of aspirations held by people in all nations.”
“I will accept this award as a call to action,” Obama said, actions to establish a “new era of engagement,” actions to stop the spread of nuclear weapons, actions to reduce global warming, and actions to create “a new beginning” in which people of different religions live peacefully in a world of mutual interest and mutual respect.
But, even as he walks down this peaceful path, Obama gave a nod to the not-so-peaceful reality he faces as commander in chief of the United States.
“We have to confront the world as we know it today,” he acknowledged, a world where the U.S. is winding down a war in Iraq and in Afghanistan faces “a ruthless adversary that directly threatens the American people and its allies.”
That was a nod to Obama’s most important event of the day: a meeting in the Situation Room, away from the Rose Garden’s bright sunshine, where the president was going to meet with his national security team and military leaders about the United States’ 8-year-old war in Afghanistan.
General David Petraeus, the author of the surge strategy in Iraq, was going to be there, while General Stanley McChrystal, the U.S. commander in Afghanistan, was scheduled to join by videoconference. McChrystal has urged the president to send 40,000 more U.S. troops to Afghanistan.
The Nobel Peace Prize was the last thing Obama needed as he makes probably one of the most consequential decision of his presidency. It will make the howls of protest even louder if he follows the advice of his generals and sends more young Americans to kill—and be killed—in a foreign land.
The Nobel committee, of course, wasn’t thinking of Afghanistan. It credited Obama for creating “a new climate in international politics” that emphasizes “a global response to global challenges.”
What will they think if the man of peace becomes a man of war?
Kent Hoover is the Washington bureau chief for bizjournals.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.




