Recent Blog Posts
-
Snow Be Damned! The Feds Have Global Warming to Discuss
Feb 08 20103:38 pm EDT -
Obama Seeks More Ammo for SBA
Feb 05 20103:45 pm EDT -
Senate Showdown: Business vs. Labor
Feb 04 20104:21 pm EDT -
TARP Goes Across the Tracks
Feb 03 20103:38 pm EDT -
An Idea Whose Time Has Passed
Feb 02 20103:58 pm EDT -
Obama Punts on Long-Term Deficits
Feb 01 20103:23 pm EDT -
U.S. Gets Serious About Nuclear Power
Jan 29 20103:17 pm EDT -
The Old, New, Borrowed, and Blue of Obama's State of the Union
Jan 28 201012:04 pm EDT -
Geithner Gets Grilled
Jan 27 20104:54 pm EDT -
No Brakes on This Train
Jan 26 20104:03 pm EDT
Links
- Tapped: The American Prospect

- Marc Ambinder

- National Review

- KausFiles

- firedoglake

- The Politico

- The Daily Dish

- Blogging Heads

- Swampland

- Freakonomics

- Atrios

- Daily Kos

- Real Clear Politics

- The Political Animal

- Power Line

- Instapundit

- Matthew Yglesias

- Drudge Report

- Talking Points Memo

- Huffington Post

- Red State.org

The Phony Populist, Part II
Earlier this winter, I wrote a piece saying that John Edwards populist persona was phony. He'd been a centrist member of Congress and on the biggest domestic issue in the country--health care--his position was indistinguishable from that of the more business friendly Hillary Clinton. Now we can add Clinton and Obama to the ranks of phony populists. Each is now incensed about NAFTA, the North American Free Trade Agreement. Clinton, you see, was secretly angry about it throughout the '90s even though she had labeled it an "accomplishment" of her husbands administration. Likewise, Barack Obama who voted along with Clinton for recent tade agreements with Peru and Oman is also outraged by NAFTA. Please.
Both are moderately pro trade and like a lot of people are having second thoughts about some of these trade deals.They're not reflexively pro any trade agreement the way that John McCain is. I saw McCain on C-SPAN not long ago. They were covering one of his rallies when someone in the scrum that followed one of his speeches asked himw hat his policy was toward Latin America. "Free trade. free trade. free trade," he said which is not exactly the most sphisticated answer coming from a senior senator whose state has a long international border. But it was at least honest which is probably more than I can say for Clinton and Obama who have Ohioed up there basically pro-trade positions for the sake of a primary. Clinton, at least has the excuse of desperation. Obama, who prides himself on hard truths, doesn't have that modest fig leaf.






