Home > Views > Blogs > Capital > Clinton's Time Out on Trade
EMAIL
PRINT
RSS
SHARE
TEXT SIZE:
SHARE
Send a copy to me

Separate multiple email addresses (max 20) with commas.

0/1500

Main
The Last Clinton Campaign   Hillary, Chelsea and Pete Peterson
Feb 20 2008 12:36PM EST

Clinton's Time Out on Trade

Racheting up the populist rhetoric, Hillary Clinton has been talking about a time out on trade deals. I find this odd given that her policy positions usually have some subtlety to them. First, she just voted for the Peru deal, as did Barack Obama. So why the timeout now? Why not a few months ago when she voted to ratify that important deal. Second, why not look at each individual deal on the merits rather than declare some wholesale moratorium? After all, a number of deals are coming down the pike including important ones with Colombia which is in a politically precarious situation and would urgently like to close the deal with the U.S. and, more importantly, South Korea which would be the biggest bilateral deal since the NAFTA accords more than a decade ago. There's reason to question both deals. Democrats are concerned about trade union rights in Colombia, for instance. But why not examine each deal on the merits and make a decision rather than have a wholesale moratorium? I suspect the moratorium is a way of sounding Edwardsesque on trade in general while still being, at heart, someone who wants to forge good international deals. But why lock yourself in?

I note, as always, that my wife works for Clinton.

See more in

Loading...

Add Your Comment

Required fields are marked with an asterisk (*)
Add a comment

Recent Blog Posts

Archive

Previous
Dec
2008
Next


Also in Portfolio.com
Most Read
Most Emailed
Recently Commented