Recent Blog Posts
-
The Bill That Wouldn’t Die
Nov 21 20099:30 pm EDT -
Republicans Talk Turkey on Health Care
Nov 20 20093:54 pm EDT -
Contracts Stolen From Veterans
Nov 19 20093:57 pm EDT -
Main Street's Credit Crunch
Nov 18 20095:41 pm EDT -
Criminalizing Failure
Nov 17 20095:55 pm EDT -
Casablanca on the Potomac
Nov 16 20095:22 pm EDT -
So Big It Will Fail?
Nov 10 20093:02 pm EDT -
Health Care’s ‘Wild West’
Nov 09 20093:57 pm EDT -
Obama's Secret Jobs Plan
Nov 06 20093:13 pm EDT -
Health Bill Wins Key Support
Nov 05 20093:15 pm EDT
Links
- Tapped: The American Prospect

- Marc Ambinder

- National Review

- KausFiles

- firedoglake

- The Politico

- The Daily Dish

- Blogging Heads

- Swampland

- Freakonomics

- Atrios

- Daily Kos

- Real Clear Politics

- The Political Animal

- Power Line

- Instapundit

- Matthew Yglesias

- Drudge Report

- Talking Points Memo

- Huffington Post

- Red State.org

The Economic Advisers
Yesterday, the New York Times ran a piece on the economic advisers to the presidential candidates. This morning the National Association of Business Economists had a panel had a panel featuring some of them: Austan Goolsbee for Barack Obama, Gene Sperling for Hillary Clinton (my spouse also works for her), Leo Hindery for John Edwards, Michael Boskin for Rudy Giuliani, and Douglas Holtz-Eakin for John McCain.
I guess the thing that struck me the most is how wide the gulf is between the two parties. All the Democrats have a universal health care program on the table. None of the Republicans do. All of the Republicans want to keep the Bush tax cuts, including McCain who voted against them. All of the Democrats want to roll them back for the wealthiest Americans. All of the Democrats are questioning the trade agreements, although both Obama and Clinton support the Peru agreement which is heading towards ratification. All of the Republicans reflexively support all of these deals.
Goolsbee was funny and engaging. Sperling was earnest. Hindery at a hint of populist anger. Boskin gave the sunniest assessment of the current economy while Holtz-Eakin was very dour. At this point could Rudy be any closer to Bush?






