Recent Blog Posts
-
Obama's Secret Jobs Plan
Nov 06 20093:13 pm EDT -
Health Bill Wins Key Support
Nov 05 20093:15 pm EDT -
Chamber Goes Green?
Nov 04 20093:54 pm EDT -
Record Fine for Housing Bias
Nov 03 20094:38 pm EDT -
Score One for the Unions
Nov 02 20093:54 pm EDT
Links
- Tapped: The American Prospect

- Marc Ambinder

- National Review

- KausFiles

- firedoglake

- The Politico

- The Daily Dish

- Blogging Heads

- Swampland

- Freakonomics

- Atrios

- Daily Kos

- Real Clear Politics

- The Political Animal

- Power Line

- Instapundit

- Matthew Yglesias

- Drudge Report

- Talking Points Memo

- Huffington Post

- Red State.org

What Utah Mines and Subprime Have in Common
Regulation has been a dirty word in American politics for decades. Jimmy Carter deregulated the oil and airline industries because he thought it was good policy and he wanted to escape the onus of being a liberal regulator. Reagan and the Bushes railed against regulation. When it came to Bill Clinton and affirmative action, he promised to mend it not end it. No one in the American polity on left or right openly calls for a new era of regulation. But all of the stories in recent weeks that have dominated headlines--from tainted Chinese products to the Utah mine collapse and, closest to home for Portfolio readers, the subprime mess call out for a need for new and better regulations. Of course, there are stupid regulations on the books. But just as we make distinctions between weapons systems that work and those that don't we should be just as discerning with regulation instead of attacking them wholesale. In some areas of life, we need more regulation--much more. And in some, less. A candidate who spoke like that might find a willing audience. I know he or she would be on their way to being a good president.






