Recent Blog Posts
-
Cybersecurity Czar Steps Down
May 17 20122:41 pm EDT -
House Passes Controversial Cybersecurity Bill With Surprise Vote
Apr 27 201212:09 pm EDT -
Generation Startup Gets SBA Encouragement
Apr 24 20125:25 pm EDT -
Google Spends Big in Washington
Apr 24 201212:30 pm EDT -
Young Entrepreneurs Call for More Congressional Encouragement
Apr 18 20124:06 pm EDT -
A Nation Divided on Taxes
Apr 16 201211:37 am EDT -
Are Intellectual Property and National Security Really Linked?
Apr 13 20124:40 pm EDT -
Netflix Starts PAC
Apr 09 20122:27 pm EDT -
JOBS Act Changes Game for Startups
Apr 05 20124:39 pm EDT -
Investors (and Liberals) Beware! Here Comes JOBS Act
Apr 04 201210:06 am EDT
Links
- Tapped: The American Prospect

- Marc Ambinder

- National Review

- KausFiles

- firedoglake

- The Politico

- The Daily Dish

- Blogging Heads

- Swampland

- Freakonomics

- Atrios

- Daily Kos

- Real Clear Politics

- The Political Animal

- Power Line

- Instapundit

- Matthew Yglesias

- Drudge Report

- Talking Points Memo

- Huffington Post

- Red State.org

President Romney, Part III
One of the things I tried to do in my piece in Portfolio is explain how Romney makes decisions, or at least did at Bain Capital. The private equity firm grew out of Bain & Company, the consulting firm at which Romney began his career and where he returned to stave off its bankruptcy. Bain Capital reflected its genesis. It was heavily analytical and relished long term relations with its clients. It has the highest carry rate of any of the PE firms and it's staff is the largest, reflecting its consulting approach. I liked that Romney likes to absorb a lot of data. I like too that he encourages a lot of debate around the table. The Bain Capital Review process was basically a no holds barred discussion about whether they should invest in a particular company. You could disparagingly call Romney the consultant in chief but I think that fails to give him his due.
The down side of all this is that he strikes me as craven enough to say somethings that are just this side of assinine. Double the size of Gitmo? Please. I'm sure neither the Pentagon nor the CIA wants that let alone the State Department which has had to explain our little detention facility for the past seven years. I respectfully believe that someone can go from being pro life to pro choice and vice versa. Dennis Kucinich used to be pro life and the lefties never question his bona fides. So I believe Mitt Romney sincerely when he says he's pro life. I find it harder to believe that it was invisible-to-the-eye embryonic stem cells that convinced him. Maybe I'm wrong but his explanation that the decision over whether to fund embryonic stem cell research made him pro life seems to strain credulity. I'm just guessing here but I suspect he was never that pro choice and the flip flop was less of one than it appears.
I also asked Romney about gay marriage. Something that didn't make it into the piece. I asked him if the data showed that gay marriage was not having an adverse efffect on heterosexual marriage would he still oppose it. He said he would. That's an honest answer but it's not a Bain one either. I respect someone who opposes gay marriage but the opponents should probably acknowledge at this point that the Massachusetts experience, thus far, shows no impact on heterosexual marriage. Mitt Romney's career has been about the data and in this case the data is less alarming that the former governor led Massachusetts to believe at the time.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





