Recent Blog Posts
-
Obama's Secret Jobs Plan
Nov 06 20093:13 pm EDT -
Health Bill Wins Key Support
Nov 05 20093:15 pm EDT -
Chamber Goes Green?
Nov 04 20093:54 pm EDT -
Record Fine for Housing Bias
Nov 03 20094:38 pm EDT -
Score One for the Unions
Nov 02 20093:54 pm EDT
Links
- Tapped: The American Prospect

- Marc Ambinder

- National Review

- KausFiles

- firedoglake

- The Politico

- The Daily Dish

- Blogging Heads

- Swampland

- Freakonomics

- Atrios

- Daily Kos

- Real Clear Politics

- The Political Animal

- Power Line

- Instapundit

- Matthew Yglesias

- Drudge Report

- Talking Points Memo

- Huffington Post

- Red State.org

Roe holds
This morning's Supreme Court decision is a setback for abortion-rights advocates. But it's hard to see how the 5-4 ruling is really a major blow to Roe v. Wade or those who fought to . I got a flurry of emails from groups on both sides today proclaiming it as a great victory. But I think the Roberts court is still a long, long way from dismantling abortion rights as we know them and I doubt it ever will. First, even the majority opinion upholding the Congressional law banning the procedure by Justice Anthony Kennedy invited another case to overturn this one limit on abortion. Second, the basic framework of Roe seems pretty well intact; the Kennedy opinion said that it was in keeping with earlier decisions that affirmed Roe. Thomas and Scalia were forced to offer a concurrence that said that Roe had no constitutional foundation and notably neither Roberts nor Kennedy nor Alito went along with that. Third, Justice Roberts has said that he wants to try and put together some unanimous opinions on the court or at least bigger majorities. Fat chance. If they're split 5-4 on this, there's just no appetite for reversing 34 years of Roe and what has become one of the most common medical procedures in the country.






