Recent Blog Posts
-
Cybersecurity Czar Steps Down
May 17 20122:41 pm EDT -
House Passes Controversial Cybersecurity Bill With Surprise Vote
Apr 27 201212:09 pm EDT -
Generation Startup Gets SBA Encouragement
Apr 24 20125:25 pm EDT -
Google Spends Big in Washington
Apr 24 201212:30 pm EDT -
Young Entrepreneurs Call for More Congressional Encouragement
Apr 18 20124:06 pm EDT -
A Nation Divided on Taxes
Apr 16 201211:37 am EDT -
Are Intellectual Property and National Security Really Linked?
Apr 13 20124:40 pm EDT -
Netflix Starts PAC
Apr 09 20122:27 pm EDT -
JOBS Act Changes Game for Startups
Apr 05 20124:39 pm EDT -
Investors (and Liberals) Beware! Here Comes JOBS Act
Apr 04 201210:06 am EDT
Links
- Tapped: The American Prospect

- Marc Ambinder

- National Review

- KausFiles

- firedoglake

- The Politico

- The Daily Dish

- Blogging Heads

- Swampland

- Freakonomics

- Atrios

- Daily Kos

- Real Clear Politics

- The Political Animal

- Power Line

- Instapundit

- Matthew Yglesias

- Drudge Report

- Talking Points Memo

- Huffington Post

- Red State.org

Roe holds
This morning's Supreme Court decision is a setback for abortion-rights advocates. But it's hard to see how the 5-4 ruling is really a major blow to Roe v. Wade or those who fought to . I got a flurry of emails from groups on both sides today proclaiming it as a great victory. But I think the Roberts court is still a long, long way from dismantling abortion rights as we know them and I doubt it ever will. First, even the majority opinion upholding the Congressional law banning the procedure by Justice Anthony Kennedy invited another case to overturn this one limit on abortion. Second, the basic framework of Roe seems pretty well intact; the Kennedy opinion said that it was in keeping with earlier decisions that affirmed Roe. Thomas and Scalia were forced to offer a concurrence that said that Roe had no constitutional foundation and notably neither Roberts nor Kennedy nor Alito went along with that. Third, Justice Roberts has said that he wants to try and put together some unanimous opinions on the court or at least bigger majorities. Fat chance. If they're split 5-4 on this, there's just no appetite for reversing 34 years of Roe and what has become one of the most common medical procedures in the country.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





