BizJournals Portfolio
Nov 04 2007 12:00am EDT

New York Times: On the Other Hand...

He didn't call them on it explicitly, so he probably didn't violate decorum. But the NYT's Andrew Ross Sorkin sure seems to be distancing himself from his colleagues' contention nine days ago that Stan O'Neal's phone call to Wachovia was "a major breach of corporate protocol."

There has, of course, been plenty of side-debate about whether O'Neal's phone call to Wachovia was a clear wrong-doing, a borderline act with bad timing, or a purely artificial slight exploited by opponents. In all of that debate, however, Jack Flack saw no reference to the fact that the chairman of the Merrill board had been completely informed of the call. That's because, of course, O'Neal himself was the chairman.

The absurdity of CEO O'Neal giving Chairman O'Neal a heads-up only further highlights why governance activists hate the dual role. But if you were O'Neal last weekend, it would have been impossible to resist reminding the unhappy directors of your chairmanship.


Comments

If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.


Connect With Portfolio.com

Come on, like us—you know you want to.

Follow us and if you're an innovative entrepreneur, we'll return the favor.

Today's top stories, conversation starters, and the back nine business bites.

spotlight on

People & Ideas

Whisky To-Go-Go

Now there's a company that let's you taste your knowledge of fine blended Scotches by mixing a whisky of your own. Read More