Recent Blog Posts
-
Larry's Freudian Fumble
Mar 14 20113:34 pm EDT -
Jack Flack Says Thank You.
Oct 24 200811:25 am EDT -
Lobbyist Wars: May the DOJ Be With You
Sep 29 200810:51 pm EDT -
Google Is Steaming Into an Antitrust Swamp
Sep 24 200810:51 am EDT -
Parsing Goldman Sachs: All Hail Market Sentiment
Sep 22 20089:06 am EDT -
Parsing Paulson: All Aboard. Now.
Sep 19 20081:12 pm EDT -
Parsing Bank of America: Crisis Is Our Friend
Sep 15 20082:30 pm EDT -
Parsing Paulson: It's a Systemic Thing
Sep 08 200810:00 am EDT -
Dear C.E.O.: Write Your Own Obituary
Sep 02 20088:42 am EDT -
Parsing Google: You Needed Another Browser Choice
Sep 02 20087:09 am EDT
Links
- Crikey

- I Want Media

- History of Communications

- PR Watch

- DealBreaker

- Talking Biz News

- Media Bistro

- Spin Thicket

- Beat the Press

- Off Message

- Media Maneuvers

- Taylor Mali

- Pseuds Corner

- O'Dwyer's PR Blog

- PRNewser

- Brand New

- DesignObserver

- Television Newswriting Workshop

- The Cycle

- BS Bingo

- PressThink

- Business and Media Institute

- Business Press Maven

- Infoshop.org

- The Audit

- Spinwatch

- Romenesko

- Press Box

- I, A Bee

- CitMedia

- Fine on Media

- Mixed Media

Sprint: Lublin and Sharma Carry the Mail
Need to send an important message to a loved one? You could call them directly, or you could do an interview with the WSJ's Joann Lublin and Amol Sharma.
That's what activist investor Ralph Witworth did in making it clear that he had lost confidence in Sprint CEO Gary Forsee, sending a big whopping signal to the Sprint board that it needs to act.
"Earlier this week, activist investor Ralph Whitworth told The Wall Street Journal that he had lost confidence in Mr. Forsee. Mr. Whitworth threatened a proxy fight for board seats unless Sprint directors 'immediately' dealt with the company's leadership issue."
Why not call the board chairman directly instead? Because the chairman is Foresee himself.
Aaah.
Forsee did not respond, but apparently other members of the board did, taking Whitworth's "immediately" quite seriously. Instead of using the telephone, e-mail or carrier pigeons, the "people familiar with the matter" chose instead to use Lublin and Sharma to reply. By doing so, the "knowledgeable" and "informed" persons effectively moved the story from "Forsee/board Under Pressure" to "Forsee to Go."
Predictably, the public correspondence triggered an avalanche that effective buries Forsee
Watch for things to accelerate, as the CEO engages his fellow board members about the public abandonment. If the story lives up to its archetype, Forsee will press for a show of confidence, which will only result in the predicted ouster.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.




