BizJournals Portfolio

Sinking Feeling

Regulating Under the Influence Regulating Under the Influence

Think the Bush White House was too closely tied with Wall Street? The Obama team is no stranger to insiders. Read More

Obama Bets on Bernanke Obama Bets on Bernanke

President Obama rewarded Ben Bernanke for his role in reviving the nation. Read More

FDIC Taps Failed Banks' Talent FDIC Taps Failed Banks' Talent

Former employees of failed banks are lining up to help the FDIC. Read More
PREV 2 of 2

I think that Cox was downplaying his agency’s mismanagement of the financial crisis. But I’d agree with him to this extent: A capital cushion is not synonymous with responsible, ethical management, particularly when regulators like Cox lack a proper grasp of what is going on.

That’s where the “corporate culture” of regulators comes into play. A good example of the deep-seated problems there emerged on Wednesday, in a damning report by the SEC Office of Inspector General on the Bernard Madoff scandal. The OIG report is a recitation of serial incompetence, inexperience, and, at times, downright cowardice—SEC officials visiting Madoff, being alternately charmed and bullied by him, and failing to take the most elementary steps to ensure that an adequate investigation was conducted. The SEC’s incompetence was not solely a failing of the Bush administration, but reached back into the 1990s, when Arthur Levitt, a self-proclaimed “investor champion,” chaired the SEC.

It’s impossible to imagine an FBI white-collar investigation being handled quite so grotesquely. The reason is that the FBI, whatever its other failings, is geared toward the handling of “bad guys.” To the SEC, however, the people it regulates—the Madoffs and Dick Fulds and Alan Schwartzes of this world—are “industry giants,” politically potent friends, and, of course, potential employers. This is what is known as “regulatory capture.”

That attitude, unfortunately, persists not just at the SEC but among all regulators, including the Federal Reserve and the Treasury, where ex-New York Fed chief Geithner has a history of being far too close to Wall Street. Radical action is needed, led by the federal government, to change the behavior of Wall Street. Safeguards need to be put in place to prevent banks from taking risks that put the economy in jeopardy—and the penalties need to be draconian.

It will require a tough attitude, more steely J. Edgar Hoover-like confrontation and less Chris Cox-style cluelessness. Boosting capital levels is a start, and a weak one. Leaving it at that is a recipe for yet another disaster.


blog comments powered by Disqus
 
U.S. Uncovered

Which cities were still making money during the recession and which went under? Our analysis.

Best U.S. metro areas that are most conducive to the creation and development of small businesses.

A look at the places best primed economically to host a major-league sports franchise.

spotlight on

Multimedia

Wealth Central

The Great Recession certainly took its toll on cities across the United States. But even with high unemployment rates and declining wages, some communities have done very well for themselves. View Interactive Feature