(Warren Buffett announcing last year that he's leaving the majority of his personal fortune to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.) 

For some, spring is the season to stroll beneath the cherry blossoms or enjoy a picnic in the park. But for shareholders, now is the time when mailboxes are overflowing with corporate reports, investor ballots, and invitations.

Yup, it’s annual-meeting season. Many of the nation’s largest companies hold their annual gatherings in April and May. While not every meeting can be billed as a must-attend event, there are a few worth keeping a close eye on.

Out in Omaha, Nebraska, expect more questions than usual about the future of Berkshire Hathaway in light of the two big announcements 76-year-old chairman and C.E.O. Warren Buffett has made in the past year. Exxon Mobil’s soiree will feature a push for serious caps on executive compensation. Home Depot aims to put former C.E.O. Robert Nardelli’s controversial $210 million exit behind it. Altria, once known as Philip Morris, stared down a shareholder push to get the company out of the tobacco business. And despite Wal-Mart’s efforts to remarket itself as greener and more socially responsible, the retailer is once again bracing for a possible parade of protestors outside its annual meeting.

The Woodstock of Capitalism, a weekend-long event built around Berkshire Hathaway’s annual meeting (on May 5 this year), is expected to again draw more than 20,000 shareholders to Omaha. What will they be buzzing about? Warren Buffett’s future. In the company’s most recent annual report, Buffett advertised for someone (or perhaps several people) to fill the coveted role of chief investment officer when he’s no longer up to it. That, coupled with his plan to direct the majority of his personal fortune to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, has made some shareholders believe that he’s stepping down. But it’s more likely that Buffett is just taking a practical approach to succession planning. As he wrote recently, “I feel terrific and, according to all measurable indicators, am in excellent health. It’s amazing what Cherry Coke and hamburgers will do for a fellow.”

Even when they’re not pondering the future of the company or its leader, Berkshire Hathaway investors will have plenty to keep them busy. Many of the firms wholly or partially owned by Berkshire—such as Geico, Dairy Queen, and Coca-Cola—will host booths in an exhibitors’ area adjacent to the main meeting hall. And the cash registers at two locally based subsidiaries, Borsheims jewelry store and Nebraska Furniture Mart, will ring up millions of dollars in sales to shareholders attracted by special discounts.

The meeting itself features an all-day Q&A session during which the Berkshire tribe can pick Buffett’s brain on subjects ranging far beyond the company’s business affairs. One of this year’s hot topics is sure to be executive compensation.

Of the more than 550 shareholder proposals tracked by Institutional Shareholder Services as of March 30, roughly a third relate to executive pay.

Many of these proposals would give shareholders advisory votes on executive compensation—a “say on pay.” Such a system is required in the U.K. and Australia, and the U.S. Congress is currently considering a bill to make it mandatory in the States. Aflac, an insurance company, is the only American firm to have adopted the idea voluntarily.

For Exxon Mobil’s May 30 gathering in Dallas, no fewer than five compensation-related resolutions (out of 15 total) are on the agenda, which will probably make for a very long, tense day. One proposal would cap salaries for the top five executives at $500,000 a year. Last year, the company’s chairman and chief executive, Rex Tillerson, received $22.4 million in total compensation.

Executive pay is hardly a new issue at shareholders meetings. In 1937, pioneer gadfly Lewis Gilbert made a fuss about Bethlehem Steel chairman Charles Schwab’s compensation of $250,000, which is equivalent to $3.6 million today. Gilbert argued that more of the company’s profits should go to share owners as dividends rather than to executives as bonuses and stock options.